What do you get when you build a tetrahedron out of magnets?
(...Or, why unification is too big an attribute to be anything but a primary tenet.).
Ralph Frost (Frost Low Energy Physics).

What a thoughtful person gets when they answer the question posed above is a quick and dirty shortcut to quantum consciousness. A secret doorway opens as one notices that the five different ways to align four rod magnets along the radii of a tetrahedron have the same dualic look and *feel* as do the five possible representations of Debye electronegativity vectors in molecules involving tetravalent atoms. That is, these five patterns dominate in organic chemistry and thus, throughout all of the lithosphere and biosphere.

At first, such a fanciful notion sounds like compound jargonic gibberish: an intriguing word salad trick perhaps, but inappropriate for the ears of more learned men and women of science. What? Structure duality in a tetrahedral manner and acquire a desktop model that directly imparts repeatable units of physical intuition on states, one-half spin, anharmonic motion, AND a *feel* for quantum consciousness, all in a few moments of just thinking? Preposterous!

Yet, a thoughtful person will soon notice that quantum consciousness is, in the main, carbon-based, thus these same five dualic structures resonate throughout all of quantum consciousness. We do share the pattern and the similar patten recognition systems. The doorway opens wider.

Oddly enough, it turns out that abstract math symbols and expressions involve "store/hold/retrieve" morphisms that are not innate in the thing itself. Thus, abstract mathematical symbols and expressions are just not synchronous enough nor robust enough to convey enough information fast enough to spark and sustain a working awareness of quantum consciousness or any of the other emerging, more unified models. More robust symbols are required.

The remainder of this paper, that is, in this initial public presentation, using standard one- and two-frequency magnetic tetrahedra, the author introduces the new symbols and traces through the discoveries of (1) the underlying principle of structured duality, (2) the solar maximum cycle as one definite quantum gravitational wave in the local region, (3) why the analog mathematical approach is effective when modeling the emerging more unified models, (4) why one-half spin is important, and (5)how binary tetrahedral symbols go about generating internal sine and cosine tables with just a bit of torsion, therein relating energy to spin to vision to smell, to memory to angles to math to speech.

The author will also describe his view of the notions: (1) "experience exists; time does not" and (2) "all HEP results only show that the unified system breaks down in repeatable ways". Lastly, some discussion will be added to show how the improved information compression ratio that is inherent in such a quick and dirty analog modeling approach fits in rather nicely in an introductory global science and mathematics educational effort.

[More to follow 4/14/03]